Drew Wutka
DWUTKA at marlow.com
Thu Apr 3 14:40:22 CST 2003
I think Access 11 is not going to run on anything older then 98...not 3.1. Drew -----Original Message----- From: Gustav Brock [mailto:gustav at cactus.dk] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:21 AM To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: Re: [AccessD] ADP vs Access mdb/SQL Hi Susan As far as I know, Access 1.x and 2.0 are the only versions that run on Windows 3.1x. So that shock - moving from Win 3.1x to a Win32 platform - will only happen for those moving now from Access 2.0 and lower (running on Win 3.1x!) to Access 95 or higher. How many could that be?? Is any member of this list running Access 2.0/Win 3.1x exclusively? Please step forward. /gustav > Well, a shock for anyone still using Win 3.1 -- can't. You have to upgrade > Windows to use Access 11. > Susan H. >> Are you sure about Access 11? >> >> Quoting Mike Gunderloy, >> Developer Central #24: Office 2003 First Impressions and more! >> >> "Access has no significant changes from Access 2002. It's not an exciting >> time to be an Access developer. I'm revising one Access book for the new >> version, but don't expect to do much other work with it." >> >> /gustav >> >> >> > And what if it is? Think about it guys -- although some conversions are >> > more work than others, and certainly Access 11 is going to be a shock >> > (and Access 12 even more so) for a few still running older >> > versions on W 3.1, has >> > MS ever really just left you hanging? Well, maybe it has <g>, I probably >> > shouldn't ask when I don't really know the answer. _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com