[AccessD] ADP vs Access mdb/SQL

Drew Wutka DWUTKA at marlow.com
Thu Apr 3 18:36:25 CST 2003


Ah, a girl after my own heart! <VBG>

I concur...but I wouldn't be surprised if the real big 'conversion' is split
over the next two (or even three) releases.

Drew

-----Original Message-----
From: Susan Harkins [mailto:harkins at iglou.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 6:12 PM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: Re: [AccessD] ADP vs Access mdb/SQL


> I'm sure 2.0 is still widely used, but I am also sure that there are a LOT
> of 97 users.  I've talked to people in a lot of companies, that have ALL
> stuck with 97.

============Tons of 97 users and developers still out there -- a ton. :) No
doubt about it, 97 was a great version and a lot of people just kept it.
Upgrades to 2000 and XP were small in comparison. I predict lots of people
will finally make the big jump with 2003 -- from 97 to 2003 I mean. Really
large upgrades tend to skip a few generations. It's just time, although I
don't know that any version will ever compete with 97.

Susan H.

_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com


More information about the AccessD mailing list