MartyConnelly
martyconnelly at shaw.ca
Mon Apr 21 15:00:49 CDT 2003
Lawyer's seem to like Office's support of digital rights management. When used with Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Office 2003 allows a document owner to restrict how a document or e-mail can be used by limiting others' ability to save, print, or forward it. And the ability to provide permissions to specific sections of a document using SharePoint Team Services makes it easier to allow for multiple edits, to simultaneously happen to the same document. But SharePoint doesn't seem to allow for a server license only per seat which makes it a bit restrictive and expensive for net use. Ahh but lawyers get excited about all sorts of things. I remember showing them how to put in a one by one pixel web bug to tell them who might be reading their word doc files. mwp.reid at queens-belfast.ac.uk wrote: >Not really was a joke. They do cause problems in multi version development >environments. > >Martin > >Quoting "Wortz, Charles" <CWortz at tea.state.tx.us>: > > > >>Martin, >> >>Are you saying that Signed Digital Security Certificates and Macro >>Security are both buggy? But then what is one to expect from a bunch >>of >>idiots that cannot ever get it through their pea-brains to always >>check >>for buffer overflow? Everyone at Microsoft, from Bill Gates on down, >>needs to have signs on top of their monitors that say "Check for >>buffer >>overflow!" >> >>Charles Wortz >>Software Development Division >>Texas Education Agency >>1701 N. Congress Ave >>Austin, TX 78701-1494 >>512-463-9493 >>CWortz at tea.state.tx.us >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Mwp.Reid at Queens-Belfast.AC.UK >>[mailto:Mwp.Reid at Queens-Belfast.AC.UK] >>Sent: Monday 2003 Apr 21 10:30 >>To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com >>Subject: RE: [AccessD] Access 2003 - Survey >> >> 5. List of bugs cleared by this version. >> >>None to very few. >> >> >>6. List of bugs introduced in this version. >> >>Signed Digital Security Certificates and Macro Security >> >> >>Martin >> >> >>>John >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >>>>[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of >>>>Wortz, Charles >>>>Sent: 21 April 2003 13:20 >>>>To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com >>>>Subject: RE: [AccessD] Access 2003 - Survey >>>> >>>> >>>>Martin, >>>> >>>>1. List of features that no longer work as in the previous >>>> >>>> >>version. >> >> >> >>>>2. List of features that still work but are no longer supported. >>>> >>>> >>3. >> >> >> >>>>List of new features. 4. List of reasons why for 1., 2., and 3. >>>> >>>>Charles Wortz >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Mwp.Reid at Queens-Belfast.AC.UK >>>>[mailto:Mwp.Reid at Queens-Belfast.AC.UK] >>>>Sent: Saturday 2003 Apr 19 04:48 >>>>To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com >>>>Subject: [AccessD] Access 2003 - Survey >>>> >>>>Folks >>>> >>>>When a new version of Access is released by MS, what sort of >>>>information >>>>about >>>>the new version do you need to be available right away. >>>> >>>>This is a major opportunity to get what you want included in the >>>> >>>> >>>White >>> >>> >>>>Paper >>>>aimed at developers of Access solutions. >>>> >>>>I want to ensure that real world issues are covered i.e. give you >>>> >>>> >>>the >>> >>> >>>>sort of >>>>stuff you want as opposed to what some people think you need. >>>> >>>> >>>>Martin >>>> >>>> >>_______________________________________________ >>AccessD mailing list >>AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >>http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >>Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >> >> >> >_______________________________________________ >AccessD mailing list >AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > >