Drew Wutka
DWUTKA at marlow.com
Fri Apr 25 00:56:52 CDT 2003
That's exactly what I was getting at. You lose a majority of the pluses with having a FE/BE setup! Drew -----Original Message----- From: Stuart McLachlan [mailto:stuart at lexacorp.com.pg] Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 4:18 AM To: Gustav Brock; accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: Re: [Accessd] FE/BE on server vs FE on workstation/BE on server? It may be safe, but you don't gain any of the network traffic reductions which are one of the main benefits of splitting On 24 Apr 2003 at 10:38, Gustav Brock wrote: > > eh?? You're normally not that dense - or have you again being working > all night ... what I mean is, of course, that putting the FE on the > server has nothing to do with not splitting the database. If you take > your precautions and the FE is nice and doesn't write to itself it can > be perfectly safe to run it this way. > > /gustav > > > >> Putting the FE on the server is just like not splitting the FE to > >> begin with. That's about it, in a nutshell. > > > Ahh ... if so it doesn't fit in that nutshell. > > _______________________________________________ > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- Lexacorp Ltd http://www.lexacorp.com.pg Information Technology Consultancy, Software Development,System Support. _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com