[AccessD] Access 2003 Book Recommendation - Retry

I am in the middle of speaking to a publisher about one. So who knows. I
dont think there are to many differences in 2003 however mostly XML stuff.

Martin



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Susan Harkins" <ssharkins at bellsouth.net>
To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving"
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2003 Book Recommendation - Retry


> The last I heard there would be no ADH for 2003 -- things change, so don't
> quote me.
>
> Mike G and I wrote an Access 2003 for Que, but it's in the Absolute
> Beginner's Guide series and of no help to anyone already using Access. I
> know Que upgraded Jenning's Special Edition Using Access to 2003.
Publishers
> aren't too keen on publishing high-end 2003 books -- at least they haven't
> been.
>
> There aren't any major differences but there are a few new features. If
you
> can use Access 2000 or 2k, you'll have no problem adapting to 2003.
>
> Susan H.
>
>
> > No help, but thought I'd at least reply that I'm not.
> > Susan
> >
> > At 10:29 AM 12/19/03, you wrote:
> > >Well, since this request got so many (like zip-zero-nada) responses
> (other
> > >than the autoresponse...) <grin>, I thought I might rephrase it a bit.
> > >
> > >Does anyone have Access 2003 reference manuals/handbooks/books/whatever
> that
> > >they prefer?  Or is this whole book process pointless since Access 2003
> is
> > >so much like Access 2002 that the books won't differ much?
> > >
> > >Thanks!
> > >Greg W. Smith
> > >Weeden1949 at hotmail.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>