[AccessD] PDF for word ...

Gustav Brock gustav at cactus.dk
Mon Feb 24 05:27:00 CST 2003


Hi Brett

I downloaded this and ran my old test.
The output of Pdf995 is close to identical to that of Acrobat.

File size is slightly larger. This may be due to the compression; if
Acrobat is set to use lzw compression, file size is almost identical.

If you study the pdf, it looks like pdf995 uses the Ghostscript
libraries as their is a reference to these.

To conclude, no reason to hold your purchase.

/gustav


> I tested PDF995 with our Access based quoting system, and the results were
> identical to that of Acrobat.  The quotes produced by this application range
> between 20 and 100 pages, and contain embedded graphics (logos), lines and
> boxes.  I noticed that the files produced were larger, but still we're
> talking KB not MB or GB!

> I guess the burning question is this:  Is it really necessary to have output
> that is IDENTICAL to Acrobat?  After all, I have seen Acrobat mangle up
> certain documents, so is it really necessary to have a competing product
> emulate that result?

> I would like to hear the differences, though.  We are about to purchase
> licenses for all of our workstations (~50), and it would be nice to know
> about any limitations before purchasing it.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gustav Brock [mailto:gustav at cactus.dk]
> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 7:23 AM
> To: Brett Barabash
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] PDF for word ...


> Hi Brett and Tom et al

> Be careful with these. I did a test some months ago and none of them
> (nor Win2pdf) created output identical to that from Acrobat.

> For some cases any pdf is fine, I know, but for critical jobs it is
> not.

> /gustav


>> How about PDF995 (www.pdf995.com)?  Installs like any other Windows print
>> driver, so you can create PDF files from any document just by printing to
>> it.  And under $10 bucks to boot!

>> FYI - low price - $35 & $40.

>> http://www.docauto.com/MakePDF.htm




More information about the AccessD mailing list