[AccessD] relations in which database

John Colby jcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Wed Jun 4 08:39:32 CDT 2003


I have never heard of this.  Keep us informed on whether this is true.

John W. Colby
www.colbyconsulting.com

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:25 AM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: RE: [AccessD] relations in which database


Hi Charles,

The advantages are not mine but I got them from several forums. We have
noticed that the performance of our application is slowing down. In our
search to solutions we have found some usefull things. 
One of the solutions is moving the relationships from the be to the fe. The
jet engine can do it joining, selecting and interpreting localy in it own
database instead of over the network in another (BE) database. So only
storage is in the BE all the intelligence is in the FE

In mine humble opinion this sounds logical and in situations when you have
more than one BE I think this is the only solution to relate tables to each
other. So why not do this, it seems to work and available in Access. Am I
not sure how JET acts when there are the same relationships in the FE and BE


gr marcel





-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Wortz, Charles
Sent: woensdag 4 juni 2003 15:05
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: RE: [AccessD] relations in which database


Marcel,

Since relationships are between and among tables, and since the tables
reside in the BE, why do you think the relationships should be in the FE
and not the BE?  Also, I do not understand your so-called advantages?
Please explain.

Charles Wortz
Software Development Division
Texas Education Agency
1701 N. Congress Ave
Austin, TX 78701-1494
512-463-9493
CWortz at tea.state.tx.us



-----Original Message-----
From: Marcel Vreuls [mailto:marcel.vreuls at oop.nl] 
Sent: Wednesday 2003 Jun 04 07:57
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: [AccessD] relations in which database

Dear group,

I am stugling with the following. In our current situation I have a FE
and a BE database. The relationships are currently stored in the BE
database. Now the question is why not put them in the FE database and
just leave the plain tables in the be database.

Advantages should be
- performance in multiuser env.
- more control over the database because with each update you can
change, add a relationship
- peoplo who want to access the database through excel, and so on have
more trouble in comprending the database.
- field updates, new tables are easily to create instead of using 3rd
party backend updaters

Are there disadvantages???

Thanks,

marcel vreuls
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 1056 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://databaseadvisors.com/pipermail/accessd/attachments/20030604/44022a59/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the AccessD mailing list