[AccessD] ADP vs. MDB for SQL 2000

Thanks Susan,
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-admin at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-admin at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Susan Harkins
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 4:22 PM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: Re: [AccessD] ADP vs. MDB for SQL 2000


http://www.techrepublic.com/article.jhtml?id=r00620021204ssh01.htm&src=searc
h

======This might be a tad unethical, but this article gives you an idea of
when Access really is the best database -- might give you an edge on what
the other guy's telling the decision makers. ;)

I don't necessarily agree with Martin -- just because you have SQL Server
isn't a good reason to go .adp, BUT if you have all the pieces and it's just
a question of choice, why not?

Susan H.


> Chris
>
> Whats the application? How many users? etc all the usual stuff. Choice
depends
> on a lot of things. Does the customer need the power of SQL Server right
now
> or will they need it very soon? If they are already using SQL Server I
would
> go Access XP and ADPs.
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
>

_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com