[AccessD] Days Past Due - Grace Period

Be sure to send the code I wrote that you're working on, with all
complaints.....<grin>

Drew

-----Original Message-----
From: William Hindman [mailto:wdhindman at bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 3:16 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Days Past Due - Grace Period


"I don't get complaints about my finished work" Drew

...so you're the guy I keep having to clean up after! ...naming conventions
are not designed so that YOU can maintain your code Drew, you wrote it
...naming conventions are designed so that someone else can maintain your
code without reinventing Nixon's expletive deleted file :((((

William Hindman
So, then, to every man his chance -- to every man, regardless of his birth,
his shining golden opportunity -- to every man his right to live, to work,
to be himself, to become whatever his manhood and his vision can combine to
make him -- this, seeker, is the promise of America.
-- Thomas Wolfe



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Drew Wutka" <DWUTKA at marlow.com>
To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'"
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 12:50 AM
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Days Past Due - Grace Period


> My naming convention does...there ya go, now you've found one! <evilgrin>
>
> My philosophy is that a naming convention should be useful, and NOT
> hindering.  Thus, my personal naming convention is a product of how I
think.
> I've been dumped on before, (here on the list! <grin>) about my naming
> convention tactics, but hey, I don't get complaints about my finished work
> (just more feature requests!) <grin>
>
> Drew
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charlotte Foust [mailto:cfoust at infostatsystems.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:48 PM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: RE: [AccessD] Days Past Due - Grace Period
>
>
> Naughty, Drew!  You're expecting anyone else to read your mind and know
> what you meant by that prefix.  I've never found a naming convention
> that lets you specify the preferred type for a variable! <G>
>
> Charlotte Foust
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drew Wutka [mailto:DWUTKA at marlow.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:33 PM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: RE: [AccessD] Days Past Due - Grace Period
>
>
> I don't think I have every prefixed a Variant as var, yet.  My logic in
> my statement is I want a string, so I prefixed it as a string, but it
> may need to be a variant, so it's declared as a variant.
>
> Drew
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gustav Brock [mailto:gustav at cactus.dk]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:24 AM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Days Past Due - Grace Period
>
>
> Hi Drew
>
> > .. I left the strStatus argument as a variant, in case it is ever
> > passed a null
>
> Then you should have renamed it varStatus ...
>
> /gustav
>
> _______________________________________________
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> _______________________________________________
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> _______________________________________________
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> _______________________________________________
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>


_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com