Kath Pelletti
KP at sdsonline.net
Fri Aug 6 17:59:52 CDT 2004
Yes - I support tolerance......and let's not even start on those disclaimers... :) Kath ----- Original Message ----- From: DWUTKA at marlow.com To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 2:06 AM Subject: RE: [AccessD] OT: Why not reply at top of message I say we vote tolerance, and just put up with the bottom posters. Top posters and bottom posters, living hand in hand, one peaceful community. The List shall be a place of harmony. Now, people that have the 20 paragraph long legal disclaimer that is repeated 10 times in a thread......they're outta here! LOL. Drew -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Kath Pelletti Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 8:42 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Why not reply at top of message Interesting - but I completely disagree. Following the same logic - when you write a system with a continuous form - do you display the *latest* records at the top - or make them scroll all the way down to see the latest data? I think that displaying chronological order descending is simple and for a list like this where we have already read the original post we only want to read the reply. I also think that your definition of Usenet Etiquette, like most 'rules' on the Internet can always be open for reasonable debate. I guess the question is - what is the netiquette for AccessD on this topic? Kath -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com