[AccessD] OT: Why not reply at top of message

Bryan Carbonnell carbonnb at sympatico.ca
Sat Aug 14 09:57:12 CDT 2004


On 6 Aug 2004 at 11:24, DWUTKA at marlow.com wrote:

> I do think that if you have to scroll through a previous email, to get
> to it's reply, then it should have been a top post, to allow us to
> read the reply, and go backwards if we want.  It's not laziness that
> promotes top-posting, it's forgetfulness that prompts bottom-posting.

I think the lazy folks are the top posters, because they don't/won't 
trim what isn't necessary.

The post I am replying to had 3 AccessD footers in in. Not 1 of them 
made it past my bottom post. 

-- 
Bryan Carbonnell - carbonnb at sympatico.ca
I've learned.... 
That the less time I have to work with, the more things I get done.





More information about the AccessD mailing list