[AccessD] QuickBooks Project... Anyone game?

Robert Gracie Subscriptions at servicexp.com
Thu Jun 10 19:00:25 CDT 2004


Christopher,
 At this point (just starting), I am able to create a new customer, and a
invoice completely within my program. Now, QuickBooks has too be open, (I
think I maybe able to use their QuickBooks Remote Data Sharing Client with
QuickBooks Remote Data Sharing Server to get around this but I'm not sure)
to interact with the data. Outside of that it's seamless.


Robert Gracie
www.servicexp.com


-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Christopher
Hawkins
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 8:53 PM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: RE: [AccessD] QuickBooks Project... Anyone game?


Mine are too.  The trick is, how seamless can it be made?  The last
time I looked at the SDK and the documentation, it appeared to me
that part of the non-seamlessness was baked in to QB itself.

-C-

---- Original Message ----
From: Subscriptions at servicexp.com
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com,
Subject: RE: [AccessD] QuickBooks Project... Anyone game?
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 20:22:20 -0400

>Wow
> Intuit has a greater then 85% market share. I'm not sure about you
>guys,
>but my clients are screaming for a strong solution that interacts
>with
>QuickBooks in my products.
>
>
>Robert Gracie
>www.servicexp.com
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of John Bartow
>Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 10:18 PM
>To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
>Subject: RE: [AccessD] QuickBooks Project... Anyone game?
>
>
>Mark, I don't want to continue this OT too much but I have to agree
>- even
>though I use it. You can't even have a customer be a vendor that you
>also
>purchase from! Drives me nuts!
>
>JB
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of MarkH
>Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 7:46 PM
>To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
>Subject: RE: [AccessD] QuickBooks Project... Anyone game?
>
>
>Side tracking a little... We use QB for the company accounts, the
>lady
>who does my books has torn it to pieces. She has found numerous
>flaws in
>the program, in particular in relation to journal postings and VAT,
>can't remember what exactly (as I have a very short attention span)
>but
>don't be surprised if things don't always balance... I looked at
>developing a few tools (data extracts and analysis) for it but didn't
>bother starting once I realised Quickbooks couldn't even do a decent
>job
>of it themselves...
>
>Sorry to be negative but I found it to be a very disappointing piece
>of
>software, particularly in respect to data extracts, windows
>integration
>and simple accounting practices...
>
>Mark
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Rocky
>Smolin
>- Beach Access Software
>Sent: 08 June 2004 23:54
>To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
>Subject: Re: [AccessD] QuickBooks Project... Anyone game?
>
>
>Robert:
>
>I looked at the QuickBooks SDK and gave up.  Used the two-step -
>export
>from my app to their funky file format and import into QuickBooks.
>You
>can have the code if it helps.  But I think you're looking for the
>seamless solution.
>
>Rocky
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Robert Gracie" <Subscriptions at servicexp.com>
>To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving"
><accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 2:45 PM
>Subject: [AccessD] QuickBooks Project... Anyone game?
>
>
>> Ok,
>>  The first question is.. Does anyone here currently (or have plans
>in
>> the
>> future) to programmatically interact with QuickBooks 2003 or
>greater,
>either
>> on a data or "front end" (Version 2004)level?
>>
>>  The second question, would anyone here be interested in grouping
>our
>> efforts together to come up with a "wrapped" solution, such has
>been
>> done with the BEU?
>>
>>  I'm looking at a Class based solution that can handle all the
>major
>> functions a typical company would need to interact with QB.
>>
>>  What Say You?
>>
>>
>> Robert Gracie
>> www.servicexp.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> AccessD mailing list
>> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
>--
>_______________________________________________
>AccessD mailing list
>AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
>--
>_______________________________________________
>AccessD mailing list
>AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
>
>
>--
>_______________________________________________
>AccessD mailing list
>AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
>
>--
>_______________________________________________
>AccessD mailing list
>AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>


--
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com





More information about the AccessD mailing list