[AccessD] Database Un-splitter: New 'Feature' from Microsoft

Susan Harkins ssharkins at bellsouth.net
Thu Mar 4 17:20:36 CST 2004


2003 does let you work with a "local" copy of a linked table -- are you sure
someone didn't just choose the wrong option?

Susan H. 

I ran smack up against a new 'feature' of Access 2003 today. 

I have a client who, for reasons of his own, keeps his BE in Access 97.
With the purchase of new machines, some of his users have gotten to Access
2003, while others are still using 97.  I made a few changes on site last
week, using a 2003 machine for development and blithely saving my changes to
a 97 version when I was done.  

Without saying a word, 2003 made a copy of all the BE tables in the new 97
FE.   

So now my 97 user is working on a copy, disconnected from his server.  Of
course it took him 3 days' worth of work to notice. 

I'll be spending Monday cleaning up this fiasco.  And several more days,
wondering why somebody didn't put a little warning on this process!

The one good point:  he's gotten over his need to keep 97. 

 

Liz Doering
Symphony Information Services
liz at symphonyinfo.com
www.symphonyinfo.com
763-391-7400








--
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com




More information about the AccessD mailing list