[AccessD] Framework Discussion - Who's following this

Gary Kjos garykjos at hotmail.com
Mon Mar 8 15:20:31 CST 2004


1) b (or c depending on what kind of day I'm having)
2) b (or c...see above ;-) )
3) a

I have been interested in your framework concepts and methods of development 
for years John. It seems like the way to go. I just haven't been able to 
invest the time to go that route myself even though I know that it would end 
up SAVING me time and would result in a better end result in the long run.

Gary Kjos
garykjos at hotmail.com





>From: "John W. Colby" <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com>
>Reply-To: Access Developers discussion and problem 
>solving<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
>To: "Access Developers discussion and problem 
>solving"<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
>Subject: [AccessD] Framework Discussion - Who's following this
>Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:43:55 -0500
>
>My objective with this discussion is to explain the concepts and
>implementation of frameworks in sufficient detail that anyone willing to
>learn can pick up at least a few new ideas, understand classes and how they
>can solve problems, understand withevents and how using them allows us to
>encapsulate entire subsystems into an object, and understand Frameworks and
>how and why they might be useful.  I know that this is a rather large
>objective, and that some of these subjects seem rather deep.  I am
>attempting to keep the details clean and uncluttered in the beginning so
>that you can not get bogged down in stuff not relevant to the specific
>subject of the specific post.
>
>In order to accomplish this objective I need to get a feeling for who is
>following this discussion and at what level.  Would everyone interested in
>this thread please answer the following questions:
>
>1) 	Interest Level
>	a) I already pretty much do what you are discussing, just wanted to see 
>how
>you do it.
>	b) I am extremely interested in this concept and subject, would probably
>use it if I can figure it out.
>	c) I am interested and might start using some of this stuff.
>	d) Moderately interested, probably too much work for what I see getting 
>out
>of it
>	e) Marginally interested, probably never use any of it.
>
>2)	Understanding
>	a) I understand completely what is going on
>	b) I mostly follow what is happening but have a couple of things I don't
>really understand
>	c) I am trying my best but can't really follow a lot of it
>	d) Hopelessly lost, want to understand but need you to slow down a bit.
>
>3) 	Participation
>	a) I am scanning the posts lightly to just get the basics
>	b) I am reading it and attempting to follow the examples.
>	c) I am reading the posts and working through the included code, and have
>downloaded the example database
>	d) I am reading and have downloaded the database, and have worked through
>the examples in the database to see how this stuff works.
>
>I truly appreciate your participation.
>
>Thanks,
>
>John W. Colby
>www.ColbyConsulting.com
>
>
>--
>_______________________________________________
>AccessD mailing list
>AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com

_________________________________________________________________
Store more e-mails with MSN Hotmail Extra Storage – 4 plans to choose from! 
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/




More information about the AccessD mailing list