[AccessD] question on normalization

Charlotte Foust cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Fri Mar 12 10:40:26 CST 2004


Unfortunately, while zip codes are supposed to be unique, they may be
shared among several small towns or a town may have multiple zip codes.
Some buildings even have unique zip codes, but generally zip codes
belong to post offices.  I would say they were not a good candidate for
a primary key in dealing with addresses.  I've worked with postal
databases and seen some of the "duplicate" zips, where several small
towns share a post office and a zip code.  A further complication is the
+four extension.  

Charlotte Foust

-----Original Message-----
From: John Clark [mailto:John.Clark at niagaracounty.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 7:03 AM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: RE: [AccessD] question on normalization


But, in my case, it would be OK then? I will not have an issue with them
being unique. 
 
JW Clark

>>> ssharkins at bellsouth.net 3/12/2004 9:55:22 AM >>>


As a sidebar--sort of--why can't the zip itself be a primary key?

========We're told that ZIP codes aren't unique -- most are, but there
those few... I've not encountered it myself, but that's what we're told.
;) 

Susan H. 

-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com 
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd 
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com 

-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com



More information about the AccessD mailing list