[AccessD] Framework Discussion - Another poll

I was JUST going to ask that.  I didn't know what the site was doing, as far
as the 'new' archives.  My archives don't care what you put in your posts.
It archives and indexes every message that comes through.

The only two issues with my archives are posts that come in as attachments
(my code doesn't go through attachments, it's a pain), and if you have words
that are more then 255 characters long. (Let's not try that, because I would
just have to go in and delete the post.)

Drew

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com]On Behalf Of Bryan
Carbonnell
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 11:51 AM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Framework Discussion - Another poll


Actually there is absolutely no reason to add no archive.

It does nothing except take up more space.

"No Archive" or no "No Archive" it still ends up in the DBA archive.
Drew's archive may be different.

However, the replys really should have gone to John directly,
IMpersonalO.

Bryan Carbonnell
bryan_carbonnell at cbc.ca
Your friendly listmaster at work.

>>> jwelz at hotmail.com 24-Mar-04 12:24:03 PM >>>
I read most posts at this list including those by John Colby as it is 
usually possible to learn from others' trials and tribulations.

I think it would have been appropriate to place a

               no archive

in the original post for those who hit 'Reply'.  Why a second poll? 
These 
look like 'me too' in my inbox and as gratifying as that may be to
John, I 
would propose to moderators that responses to polls should require the
no 
archive term in the body of either the poll or responses.

-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com