[AccessD] OT: A survey from somebody not as well-connected as JC

Andy Lacey andy at minstersystems.co.uk
Tue Mar 30 13:12:59 CST 2004


I could write lots, or I could just say "William said it for me", which is
not just easier but also true. Agree with every word of the sentiment, if
not the detail on Netware etc.

-- Andy Lacey
http://www.minstersystems.co.uk 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com 
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of 
> William Hindman
> Sent: 30 March 2004 00:09
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: A survey from somebody not as 
> well-connected as JC
> 
> 
> ...don't take this the wrong way Steve but some of the 
> questions you ask point away from the answers you want imnsho 
> ...Access is a tool for me ...I don't get clients ...or keep 
> them ...because I use Access ...or any other tool ...I get 
> and keep clients because I solve their problems ...99% could 
> care less what I use as long as it works and fits their budget.
> 
> ...of course I'm not trying to get rich like Rocky nor invent 
> a new wheel like JC ...I do what it takes to make a client 
> happy ...that, or I colbyize them ...I got into the SBS gig 
> because a client was getting a raw deal from a Netware house 
> and I agreed to fix his network if he'd invest the money in 
> what I recommended ...he agreed and I bought a couple books 
> on SBS and found a good list and he's happy and passed me on 
> to a couple others and so on ...same with websites which I've 
> now taken up for profit ...client was getting a raw deal and 
> asked my advice ...so I bought a couple of books and found a 
> good list and its starting to look pretty nice and he wants 
> loads more and there is another waiting with baited breath 
> ...if I want the work
> :)
> 
> ...but I'm just me and don't have any intention of ever 
> working hard again ...so much of this may not apply to you 
> ...but I'd think that if you focused a lot more on what the 
> client needs rather than what gadget you're fixing to use, 
> you might solve both of your problems :)
> 
> ...just my two cents of course ...others may well see it 
> different and I won't mind at all :)
> 
> William Hindman
> ipsedixitism: something is true because I myself have said it 
> is true ...the philosophy of Noam Chomsky :)
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steven W. Erbach" <serbach at new.rr.com>
> To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" 
> <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:16 AM
> Subject: [AccessD] OT: A survey from somebody not as 
> well-connected as JC
> 
> 
> > Dear Group,
> >
> > This is for the independent developers only. If you work 
> for a company 
> > and
> you'd like to take the survey, just let me know that you're 
> not an independent developer when you reply.
> >
> > I'm curious about what you independent developers have had 
> to learn to
> keep up with the changing marketplace.
> >
> > 1) If you've managed to maintain a significant clientele by 
> developing
> Access applications, what have you done to sharpen your 
> skills to make you more attractive as the developer of choice 
> in a competitive field? That is, have you developed a 
> framework like JC, or have you gone more towards developing 
> front ends for SQL back ends like Arthur?
> >
> > 2) If you've moved away from Access development as your 
> primary source 
> > of
> income, what other platforms have you learned to make a 
> living? Do you now do mostly .NET development, ASP, SQL 
> Server, PHP, what?
> >
> > 3) If you're doing .NET development, what kind of things are you 
> > doing?
> Has it lived up to the hype? Last year about this time I was 
> searching the want ads for positions before I decided to 
> stick with my own business. I was amused by the ads that 
> profiled the "ideal" candidate as one who had deep .NET 
> experience. The stinking product had only officially been on 
> the market for one whole year with another year in beta 
> before that. Sheesh! Have you seen any real live .NET 
> implementations that are worth bragging about...or have you 
> created any?
> >
> > In short, what have you had to do to make yourself useful as an
> independent developer? I know that William works quite a bit 
> with SBS and LANs. Have any of you developed proficiency with 
> cabling and routers and such to increase your marketability?
> >
> > Do you do any security consulting, say? Do you build 
> custom-order PCs? 
> > Do
> you do LAN management, e-mail server management and setup, 
> web site development?
> >
> > One final thing: Years ago when I started I took advantage of the 
> > swing of
> the pendulum that put PC power in users' hands. That is, the 
> PC was a great analysis tool for mainframe data. Lotus 1-2-3, 
> dBASE III, Paradox, etc., were the tools that enabled users 
> and departments to fiddle with the data without having to 
> wait for the IT department to get around to their little 
> pissant application requests.
> >
> > Now the pendulum has swung the other way. Security concerns and
> scalability and distributed networks / VPNs and web-based 
> database applications have all made the pendulum swing back 
> towards centralized control...and the IT guys are loving it. 
> Or am I reading it wrong? What do you think?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Steve Erbach
> > Scientific Marketing
> > Neenah, WI
> > 920-969-0504
> >
> > Security and Virus information: http://www.swerbach.com/security
> >
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 
> 




More information about the AccessD mailing list