[AccessD] Managing Lookup Tables

Mitsules, Mark S. (Newport News) Mark.Mitsules at ngc.com
Tue May 11 10:25:31 CDT 2004


I'm reaching back towards my limited knowledge of theory, but if I
understand what you are saying, then your lookup tables represent changing
business rules.  In this case, I believe it is a classic interpretation of a
three-tier system, where data, business rules, and user interface are all
separated.


Mark



-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Fuller [mailto:artful at rogers.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 11:10 AM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: [AccessD] Managing Lookup Tables


I have been trying to devise a cool way of managing lookup tables v.
"data" tables. I.e. PaymentTypes v. Payments. It occurred to me that I
could maybe link to two different back ends, one containing only the
lookup tables and the other containing only the data tables. What I
don't like about this approach is that I tend to define everything I can
at the table level -- Caption, lookup, validation criteria, etc. etc.. I
know this is controversial, and I don't want to rekindle those threads.
What I am wondering instead is, Suppose I link the front end to the data
database, and then link it in turn to the lookups database. I'm going to
build 3 toy databases to check this out, but I'm wondering if anyone can
see any significant problems in this approach.

My basic reason for wanting to do this is so that I can freely nuke all
the data in the data database, while preserving all the data in the
lookup database.

Insights, advice, and cash donations appreciated :)
Arthur

-- 
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com



More information about the AccessD mailing list