[AccessD] [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: S-p-a-m subjects

John Colby jwcolby at ColbyConsulting.com
Tue Dec 6 19:16:07 CST 2005


I think I did change it that week.  Not sure exactly when but it was at MOST
two weeks ago (and regretting it ever since).


John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com 

Contribute your unused CPU cycles to a good cause:
http://folding.stanford.edu/
-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of DJK(John)
Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 7:46 PM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: [Spam] Re: [AccessD] [Spam] Re: S-p-a-m subjects

John

It's something that happened between 22 and 29 Nov.  Is all your incoming
mail classified as [spam], or just the AccessD stuff?  (I assume you mean
*Outlook* 2003?)  Did you change to Outlook2003 during that week?  I'm
interested, since I'm thinking of changing to it myself.

John


-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John Colby
Sent: 07 December 2005 00:38
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: Re: [AccessD] [Spam] Re: S-p-a-m subjects


I understand that, but unless I know how to get rid of the "spam"
automagically it ain't coming out.  I suspect it's another "feature" of
Access 2003 but no way to tell.  I am suddenly RECEIVING some messages with
that [spam] already in the header.  I am just hitting reply and sending
whatever is in the header back out again.


John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com 

Contribute your unused CPU cycles to a good cause:
http://folding.stanford.edu/ -----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of DJK(John)
Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 7:24 PM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: [Spam] Re: [AccessD] S-p-a-m subjects

John, it's the SPAM we're after, rather than the RE.  And it does seem to be
your incoming mail in particular that's causing the trouble.  It's
classified Charlotte's mail as spam (see below). 

John


-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John Colby
Sent: 07 December 2005 00:15
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: Re: [AccessD] S-p-a-m subjects


 I would love to, but I have no idea where it is coming from.  I cannot see
myself looking for and editing the subject of every reply.  AFAICR the RE re
re re has always existed, it is just including the word spam in there now.  

Is it possible to tell outlook not to add the RE: in the subject when
replying to something?  I would do that.


John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com 

Contribute your unused CPU cycles to a good cause:
http://folding.stanford.edu/ -----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Charlotte Foust
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 7:04 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: [Spam] Re: [AccessD] S-p-a-m subjects

I second the motion!

Charlotte Foust


-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of DJK(John)
Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 3:29 PM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: [AccessD] S-p-a-m subjects


Actual Subject:
RE: [AccessD] [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam]Re:WhyChan geFieldSi
ze/wasCha	nge FieldS	ize

Folks, is there any chance we could remove all this repeated "Re: [Spam]"
stuff from the headers, please?  Or better still, stop it being inserted in
the first place?  (JC?)

I'm always behind with my reading, and it's become a PITA during the last
week.

John


-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John Colby
Sent: 06 December 2005 19:20
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: Re: [AccessD] [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam] Re: [Spam]Re:WhyChan
geFieldSi ze/wasCha nge FieldS ize


>I hadn't gotten into Classes at the time, and so my code was awash with
arrays and routines that were far more complex then they really needed to
be.

LOL, me too. 

< --- snip --- >
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com

--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com

--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com




More information about the AccessD mailing list