[AccessD] OT: Is My ASP Covered

Bruen, Bruce Bruce.Bruen at railcorp.nsw.gov.au
Mon Dec 12 23:05:38 CST 2005


Jim,

See my others.  They are not guaranteed to run at all under 2.0  You may
have been lucky.

bruce

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Jim Lawrence
Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2005 3:56 PM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Is My ASP Covered

Just a note... Applications written on the Framework version 1 run fine
on Framework version 2 but try and upgrade the original app and all the
references are lost.... it can be very messy and time-consuming to fix
especially if like me you are not sure what and why it is all happening.

Jim 

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John Colby
Sent: December 8, 2005 5:49 AM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Is My ASP Covered

Under most conditions they are SUPPOSED to play well together, in fact
some programs may require one or the other.  One issue I ran into is
that IIS would not find the 1.1 framework when I installed it AFTER
installing the beta versions of 2.0.  I was trying to get DotNetNuke 3.2
running on my dev machine which runs on the .net framework 1.1, so I had
a specific reason for needing the old framework.  And in fact the
framework itself installed, it was just getting IIS to recognize that
was the problem.


John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com 

Contribute your unused CPU cycles to a good cause:
http://folding.stanford.edu/
-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of MartyConnelly
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 1:01 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Is My ASP Covered

I seem to remember some warnings about uninstalling Netframework 1.0 or
1.1 before applying version 2.0

John Colby wrote:

>Yes, the DotNet framework is the basis behind all of the new .net 
>languages
>- vb.net, c#.net, J#.net etc.  The latest version of the framework is 
>2.0, which comes with VS 2005.  The framework is actually free, and can

>be downloaded at any time.  The framework contains the actual 
>"compilers" for the languages, and programs for the 2.0 frmaework can 
>be written in notepad if you have the gonads.  VS is just a (VERY) 
>pretty wrapper around the process of writing code for .Net.
>
>
>John W. Colby
>www.ColbyConsulting.com
>
>Contribute your unused CPU cycles to a good cause:
>http://folding.stanford.edu/
>-----Original Message-----
>From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Rocky Smolin
>- Beach Access Software
>Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 7:55 PM
>To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
>Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Is My ASP Covered
>
>What is Framework 2.0?  Is that part of Visual Studio?
>
>Rocky
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "John Colby" <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com>
>To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" 
><accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 4:38 PM
>Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Is My ASP Covered
>
>
>  
>
>>It's part of the framework 2.0 IIRC.
>>
>>
>>John W. Colby
>>www.ColbyConsulting.com
>>
>>Contribute your unused CPU cycles to a good cause:
>>http://folding.stanford.edu/
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>>[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Rocky 
>>Smolin - Beach Access Software
>>Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 7:28 PM
>>To: AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>>Subject: [AccessD] OT: Is My ASP Covered
>>
>>Went to the Microsoft Visual Studio 2005/SQL Server 2005/Biz Talk 
>>Server
>>2006 product launch gala in Anaheim yesterday and walked out with a 
>>copy of each.  Thought I might try to learn .Net and convert the Sleep

>>Advisor to a web app.
>>
>>I had a 1:1 talk with an MS tech who advised for my application 1) use

>>SQL Server Express, 2) Reporting Services will give me the 
>>functionality I need to duplicate the Access reporting.
>>
>>In any event the fine print on the back says to use Reporting Services

>>I need ASP.NET 2.0 or later.  Is this hidden somewhere on my system or

>>is that an a la carte purchase?
>>
>>MTIA,
>>
>>Rocky Smolin
>>Beach Access Software
>>http://www.e-z-mrp.com
>>858-259-4334
>>--
>>AccessD mailing list
>>AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>>http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>>Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>
>>--
>>AccessD mailing list
>>AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>>http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>>Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>

--
Marty Connelly
Victoria, B.C.
Canada



--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com

--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com

--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com




This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information that is intended solely for the use of the intended recipient and may be subject to copyright. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail and its attachments from your system. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. Any opinion expressed in this e-mail and any attachments is not an opinion of RailCorp unless stated or apparent from its content. RailCorp is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or any attachments. RailCorp will not incur any liability resulting directly or indirectly as a result of the recipient accessing any of the attached files that may contain a virus.



More information about the AccessD mailing list