[AccessD] Time for More Legal Discussion - Oh Boy

Nicholson, Karen cyx5 at cdc.gov
Mon Jan 24 12:25:58 CST 2005


Yeah, but the guy paid over $10,000 for the system.  He wants that back.
What can you do when Microsoft claims that Access can handle 255
concurrent database connections at one time?  We all know that is just
bird-poopey.

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Brett
Barabash
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:13 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Time for More Legal Discussion - Oh Boy


Karen,
First of all, if the total loss is $3000, this is clearly a small claims
court issue.  A civil court won't hear a case under $5K, and it wouldn't
be worth it for the client to pay a lawyer to recover such a small
amount.  Of course, explaining dumbing down the evidence for a small
claims court is no small task.

Secondly, there is the legal concept of mitigation of loss.  The client
will be burdened with the task of proving that they didn't know about
the bug six months ago.  If it can be proven that they did know about it
and said nothing, the actual amount of damage will be greatly reduced.

And finally, if this can be proven to be a Microsoft technology issue
(security flaw, data corruption bug, etc.), and it is documented
(knowledgebase, 3rd party journals, etc.), it should be easy for the
developer to prove that they were not at fault.  I have gone down this
exact road with a MS solution provider for way more than $3000.  After
we reviewed the facts, it was clear to us that the problem was with the
product, not the consultant.  So sue Bill instead (oh, and good luck
with all that!).
 

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Nicholson,
Karen
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:13 AM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: [AccessD] Time for More Legal Discussion - Oh Boy

What happens when a program is written for a customer using Microsoft
Technology, and the Microsoft Technology is bad - its data, its logic.
It has cost this one client, he claims, $3000 in lost revenue and he
wants the payment for the system refunded plus damages.  The user never
notified said programmer that there was a problem even though they have
been using it for a good six months.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
The information in this email may contain confidential information that 
is legally privileged. The inform

recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you 
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the
taking 
of any action in regard to the content of this email is strictly
prohibited.  If 
transmission is incorrect, unclear, or incomplete, please notify the
sender 
immediately. The authorized recipient(s) of this information is/are
prohibited 
from disclosing this information to any other party and is/are required
to 
destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority,
states them to be the views of Tappe Construction Co.

This footer also confirms that this email message has been scanned
for the presence of computer viruses.Scanning of this message and
addition of this footer is performed by SurfControl E-mail Filter
software
in conjunction with virus detection software.

-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com



More information about the AccessD mailing list