Integers vs. Long Integers Was: RE: [AccessD] Global Variable

John W. Colby jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Thu May 19 08:44:55 CDT 2005


http://www.bobbemer.com/BYTE.HTM

Discusses 9 bit character IBM machines where the 9th bit is used for a check
bit apparently.

John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com 

Contribute your unused CPU cycles to a good cause:
http://folding.stanford.edu/

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart McLachlan
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:19 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: RE: Integers vs. Long Integers Was: RE: [AccessD] Global Variable




On 19 May 2005 at 7:23, John W. Colby wrote:

> No, it was groups of 3 bit octal numbers.
> 
> 

???
http://www.perl6.org/perl6-language/2004-09/msg00108.html
"The Honeywell 6000 (which is still around as a machine from Bull with a 6
in its name, I believe) was a word addressed machine. (Words were 36 bits
long and could hold 4 9-bit characters packed into each one.)"


http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4240144.html
"Prior art systems, for example, the Honeywell 6000 family of computers 
stored operand 3 in the bank of registers with combination logic setting up 
the pointers to identify the number and positions of leading and trailing 
zones as well as the character size, 4 bits or 9 bits, within each word and 
the position of the sign, trailing or leading."

http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/2004-October/001066.html
"On page 182 of K&R 1st edition there's a reference to an implementation of
C on the Honeywell 6000, with 9 bit bytes."
-- 
Stuart


-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com






More information about the AccessD mailing list