[AccessD] Converting to 2003

Jim

...now that the bloat in the post A2K format has been fixed, I've 
standardized on the A2K3 format whenever possible ...I no longer see any 
advantage in using the A2K format unless you're running in a mixed 
environment.

William

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim DeMarco" <Jdemarco at hudsonhealthplan.org>
To: "AccessD (E-mail)" <AccessD at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 8:03 AM
Subject: [AccessD] Converting to 2003


> We're moving our A97 apps to 2003.  A2K3 defaults to 2000 version.  Is 
> there any consensus on which format makes most sense for the upgraded apps 
> (2000 or 2003)?
>
> TIA
>
> Jim DeMarco
> Director of Application Development
> Hudson Health Plan
>
>
>
> ***********************************************************************************
> "This electronic message is intended to be for the use only of the named 
> recipient, and may contain information from Hudson Health Plan (HHP) that 
> is confidential or privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you 
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of 
> the contents of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
> this message in error or are not the named recipient, please notify us 
> immediately, either by contacting the sender at the electronic mail 
> address noted above or calling HHP at (914) 631-1611. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, please do not forward this email to anyone, and delete 
> and destroy all copies of this message.  Thank You".
> ***********************************************************************************
>
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>