[AccessD] More Strange Autonumber Behavior - Access2002(aka Access XP)

John Colby jwcolby at ColbyConsulting.com
Fri Jan 6 08:51:05 CST 2006


>We know that, Jim :-) We're just teasing. <vbg>

Teasing?  Surrogate keys vs. Natural keys is a deadly serious business!

;~0 


John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Heenan, Lambert
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 9:40 AM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: Re: [AccessD] More Strange Autonumber Behavior - Access2002(aka
Access XP)

We know that, Jim :-) We're just teasing. <vbg>

Lambert

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Jim Dettman
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 6:00 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] More Strange Autonumber Behavior - Access 2002(aka
Access XP)


<<As for Jim's comment about "Natural Keys" (yuk!) I think one problem like
this in ten years of Accessing is much less hassle than working with Natural
Keys (yuk!) for the same period of time. :-)>>

  Just having a bit of fun<g>

Jim.
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com




More information about the AccessD mailing list