[AccessD] Class Rebuttal was: Basic Unbound Form ...

DWUTKA at marlow.com DWUTKA at marlow.com
Tue Jun 13 12:47:56 CDT 2006


No, it's the size of the run-time.  A hello world executble is pretty small.

Drew

-----Original Message-----
From: Charlotte Foust [mailto:cfoust at infostatsystems.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 12:46 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Class Rebuttal was: Basic Unbound Form ...


Nice try, Drew.  That's the size of the executable because the runtime
is already on the machine.  It isn't the size of the runtime. 


Charlotte Foust

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of
DWUTKA at marlow.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:20 AM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Class Rebuttal was: Basic Unbound Form ...

LOL.  Hey, I said it was just my take on it.  You actually buy books for
this stuff though? <grin>

Nope, create a simple .exe and you get 1.4 megs (almost small enough to
fit on a floppy).  

Drew

-----Original Message-----
From: Charlotte Foust [mailto:cfoust at infostatsystems.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 10:54 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Class Rebuttal was: Basic Unbound Form ...


Gosh, Drew, I'm going to run right out and burn all my .Net books and
quit my job. ;o> And I seem to recall that the VB6 runtime was more like
13 megs if parts of it weren't already on the machine?


Charlotte

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of
DWUTKA at marlow.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:48 AM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Class Rebuttal was: Basic Unbound Form ...

On a lighter topic.... .Net.  You know, I've played around with it, and
quite frankly, I don't like it.

Not the language, I like inheritance, in fact, if they could have just
given VB inheritance, it would blow .Net out of the water.  

What really bugs me is the .Net framework required to implement a
project.
VB had it's runtimes....ok, so you couldn't create a drop in place .exe,
like you can in C++ (or Power Basic), but you're talking about 1.5 megs
worth of a runtime, not 40 megs.  That is just too much of a pain with
what I do.  Doesn't make up for the extra capabilities of .Net.

Just my humble opinion.

Drew
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com



More information about the AccessD mailing list