[AccessD] Code Tables

Robert L. Stewart rl_stewart at highstream.net
Tue Apr 24 12:20:33 CDT 2007


Charlotte,

Personally, my Clipper stuff was normalized. The Fox guys
thought they could get away with the bad design because of the
advantage that the Rushmore technology used in the idexing
gave to them.

Robert

At 12:00 PM 4/24/2007, you wrote:
>Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:58:01 -0700
>From: "Charlotte Foust" <cfoust at infostatsystems.com>
>Subject: Re: [AccessD] Code Tables
>To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving"
>         <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
>Message-ID:
>         <F55048AF7E974F429BB24597D7355EEA258C58 at INFOSERVER04.infostat.local>
>Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
>I seem to recall we did it that way in dBase too.  I think it was pretty
>standard for all the xBase languages because it was so hard to keep
>track of all the table files otherwise.
>
>Charlotte Foust





More information about the AccessD mailing list