[AccessD] Date field sort

This is not precisely formatting.  It is explicitly defining this as a date
type for sorting purposes.  

I have both used this and not.  They alternate as to which sorts the field
like a date or like a string.  Since the underlying field is a date field, I
did not do this originally as it was not necessary and should have stayed
that way.

I see options in the report for changing how it looks visually, but not it's
data type (and therefore it's sort properties).  If this is something I have
missed, let me know where to find it.

Debbie

-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart McLachlan [mailto:stuart at lexacorp.com.pg] 
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 4:02 PM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Date field sort


Are you applying a format to the Date field in the query underlying the 
report?  That will have this sort of effect.  As a general rule, you 
shouldn't do any formatting of data in queries which are used for reports. 
Do all of the formatting in the report 

On 5 Jan 2007 at 10:03, Elam, Debbie wrote:

> I have an odd problem with a report that sorts on a date field.
> 
> 3 times now for no reason I can discern the sorting gets strange.  The
first
> time it happened, I used Cdate([MyDateField]) and it started sorting
> correctly again.  Then I had to take the Cdate() off, then put it on
again.
> Only one or the other works, but they alternate.  
> 
> The wrong sorts will sort like a string.  Months are grouped together
> regardless of year and december comes before January.  And yes, I have had
> it sort like a string when I used Cdate().  
> 
> Has anyone seen anything like this in the past?
> 
> Debbie
> - JENKENS & GILCHRIST E-MAIL NOTICE - This transmission may be: (1)
subject
> to the Attorney-Client Privilege, (2) an attorney work product, or (3)
> strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this
> message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this
information.
> If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender
> (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is
a
> violation of federal criminal law. This communication does not reflect an
> intention by the sender or the sender's client or principal to conduct a
> transaction or make any agreement by electronic means.  Nothing contained
in
> this message or in any attachment shall satisfy the requirements for a
> writing, and nothing contained herein shall constitute a contract or
> electronic signature under the Electronic Signatures in Global and
National
> Commerce Act, any version of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or
any
> other statute governing electronic transactions. -- AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website:
> http://www.databaseadvisors.com

-- 
Stuart


-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
- JENKENS & GILCHRIST E-MAIL NOTICE - This transmission may be: (1) subject
to the Attorney-Client Privilege, (2) an attorney work product, or (3)
strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this
message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information.
If you have received this in error, please reply and notify the sender
(only) and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a
violation of federal criminal law. 
This communication does not reflect an intention by the sender or the
sender's client or principal to conduct a transaction or make any agreement
by electronic means.  Nothing contained in this message or in any attachment
shall satisfy the requirements for a writing, and nothing contained herein
shall constitute a contract or electronic signature under the Electronic
Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, any version of the Uniform
Electronic Transactions Act or any other statute governing electronic
transactions.