[AccessD] OT: But only Partly

Gustav Brock Gustav at cactus.dk
Thu Mar 22 05:22:14 CDT 2007


Hi Jim et al

Yes, this is to possibly eliminate any "single point of failure". Thus, you should always have at least two independent backup systems.

If you - for practical or budget reasons - have to trust a single point, this must be proved to be very reliable. Think of a mono-engine airplane.

/gustav


>>> accessd at shaw.ca 22-03-2007 03:01 >>>
According the Instructor and 15 years DBA who is teaching the course I am
currently taking...One backup system is not enough. Many big installations
have as many as 4 backup and recovery processes implemented.

Jim  




More information about the AccessD mailing list