[AccessD] Formula for a calculated field

Arthur Fuller fuller.artful at gmail.com
Sat May 26 11:56:44 CDT 2007


Oh but Susan, that is sooo against my style! I prefer to be rude and
confrontational. Gentle explanations are for weenies. LOL.

Seriously, good advice.

A.


On 5/26/07, Susan Harkins <ssharkins at setel.com> wrote:
>
> I agree with you but the customer is always right, and to a certain extent
> I
> will give her the benefit of the doubt. She wants to be able to filter the
> form and various reports by these calculated columns, so she wants to see
> them there in the table. Besides, we're probably going to upsize the app
> to
> SQL Express fairly soon, where I can have the best of both worlds, i.e.
> genuine calculated columns that consume no disk space but are logically
> "there".
>
> ======You can't base the form on a query with the calculated results?
> Arthur, give her what she wants -- show her an example where the
> calculated
> results is no longer valid because you update a value in one of the anchor
> fields, and then she gets the wrong result. Show her why want she wants is
> dangerous. Then show her how you can give her what she really wants -- the
> ability to filter records -- without the same danger.
>
> You need to gently explain to her that when her results are wrong, she's
> going to blame you.
>
> Susan H.
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>



More information about the AccessD mailing list