[AccessD] Perspective on So Cal fires 2007

Tina Norris Fields tinanfields at torchlake.com
Wed Oct 24 16:12:22 CDT 2007


Hi Rocky and Greg,
My son also lives out there.  He and his family were evacuated from La 
Mesa and are "camping out" for the duration at his place of business, 
which is right near the ocean.  I am glad for my son's family's safety 
and for yours.  I am dismayed to have the sort of wild-eyed 
disinformation that Greg refers to being spread and causing panic.  Is 
there anything we can do to help promote rational thinking?
Kindest regards,
Tina

Rocky Smolin at Beach Access Software wrote:
> What part of town do you live in?
>
> Rocky
>  
>
>
>
>
>  	
> 	
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Greg Worthey
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:14 PM
> To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
> Subject: [AccessD] Perspective on So Cal fires 2007
>
> I live in san diego.
>
> Facts on the So Cal fires:
> - has affected about 640 square miles (410,000 acres) so far. 
> - 1,000,000 people have been forcibly evacuated (last number I heard for San
> Diego county was 513,000, yesterday)
> - most of those people were ordered to leave by an automated recording,
> several miles in advance of any possible fire path. This "perfect storm", in
> fact, came nowhere near 99% of their homes.
> - 1,250 homes have been destroyed; half that from the 2003 fires
> - information about the size and location of the fires remains wildly fuzzy
> at best. Best mapped info is here:
> http://activefiremaps.fs.fed.us/kml/conus.kmz (note: you need google earth)
> - while a million people are forced to sit in parking lots and auditoriums
> (as if panic were called for), only about 1000 people in all of so cal are
> fighting fires (as if no one could help)
> - Planes were scooping water from the pacific ocean to drop on Malibu, tout
> suite, by early Monday morning. As of Wednesday morning, officials are still
> TALKING about doing the same here. It has nothing to do with wind
> conditions; same lie they used 4 years ago.
>
>
> While it's depicted on the news as a wild inferno racing to wipe out the
> western seaboard, the reality is that it's mostly low brush fires in scantly
> covered (semi-desert) unpopulated areas. It's a tragedy for wildlife, but
> mostly it's just insane overreaction (and underreaction) re people. The news
> picks the most impressive clips (i.e. a house or patch of trees in inferno),
> rather than the prevalent lowscale desert brush fire, and loops that image
> over and over. Most of the 1,000,000 people evacuated were in no danger at
> all. 
>
> Most of the 1200 houses were randomly hit (i.e. one destroyed, while
> neighbors were untouched). This indicates that in many cases a person with a
> garden hose could have put out the incipient fires on the spot, before they
> consumed anything and grew. Not in all cases, of course, but when an ember
> hits, it's going to start a SMALL fire, and a quick garden hose can put it
> out (whereas a firetruck hours later can only try to calm the all-consuming
> inferno).
>
> So not only did this new "reverse 911 system" massively inconvenience and
> frighten a MILLION people, and nearly shut down the whole county, it also
> removed all witnesses to small brush fires becoming infernos due to the fact
> that no one was there to do the least thing to prevent spreading to big fuel
> (ie. trees and houses).
>
> Insanity. Kind of like dutifully confiscating toothpaste and nail clippers,
> while allowing 75% of bombs through airport security.
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.6/1086 - Release Date: 10/22/2007
> 7:57 PM
>  
>
>   



More information about the AccessD mailing list