[AccessD] 97 / 2003 BE?

jwcolby jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Thu May 22 10:54:17 CDT 2008


8-)  Just trying to inject some humor into your difficult 
situation.


John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com


rosalyn.clarke at barclays.com wrote:
> Very funny... 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby
> Sent: 22 May 2008 16:07
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] 97 / 2003 BE?
> 
> LOL, is this the "project of the day"?
> 
> ;-)
> 
> John W. Colby
> www.ColbyConsulting.com
> 
> 
> rosalyn.clarke at barclays.com wrote:
>> Dear all
>>
>> I am deploying databases migrated from Access 97 to Access 2003.
>> Unfortunately, during the pilot phase I will have some users on Access 
>> 97 and some users on Access 2003. Obviously, I have split all the 
>> databases FE/BE, but I'm wondering whether the BE is best left in 
>> Access 97 until all the users are moved to Access 2003, or if I can 
>> link the A97 FE's to an A2003 BE at the start of the pilot. Anyone 
>> have any experience with this? Any pitfalls?
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> Roz



More information about the AccessD mailing list