[AccessD] Apologies guys - was Tags.

jwcolby jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Wed Feb 25 14:48:08 CST 2009


 > ...that assumes he can tell the difference before the morning after :)

PRECISELY.

John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com


William Hindman wrote:
> ...that assumes he can tell the difference before the morning after :)
> 
> William
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Dian" <nd500_lo at charter.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:59 PM
> To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" 
> <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Apologies guys - was Tags.
> 
>> John, just put RANT in your subject line. That way those of us who find 
>> them
>> interesting can read...others can just delete. Just a possible solution...
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 6:18 AM
>> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
>> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Apologies guys - was Tags.
>>
>> I need to find the property in Thunderbird "don't send rant".
>>
>> LOL.
>>
>> John W. Colby
>> www.ColbyConsulting.com
>>
>>
>> Arthur Fuller wrote:
>>> There's a little-known setting in Outlook -- Rant = Off. LOL.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:01 AM, jwcolby
>> <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com>wrote:
>>>>  > Who are you and what have you done with Colby?
>>>>
>>>> Who?
>>>>
>>>> John W. Colby
>>>> www.ColbyConsulting.com <http://www.colbyconsulting.com/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Rocky Smolin at Beach Access Software wrote:
>>>>> Who are you and what have you done with Colby?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rocky Smolin
>>>>> Beach Access Software
>>>>> 858-259-4334
>>>>> www.e-z-mrp.com
>>>>> www.bchacc.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
>>>>> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:10 AM
>>>>> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
>>>>> Subject: [AccessD] Apologies guys - was Tags.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wanted to apologize for the rant yesterday.  Of course there is a
>>>>> valid reason for using tags, actually two valid reasons.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) You are capable of using them
>>>>> 2) You want something that loads with the form.
>>>>>
>>>>> I used tags in the past for exactly those two reasons.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was mostly responding to the implication that NOT using the tags
>>>>> was
>>>> silly
>>>>> when "they already exist so why not".  I try very hard to use good
>>>>> programming practices and I have spent a lot of time learning how to
>>>>> use tools that make tags unnecessary FOR ME.  The hardware, and my
>>>>> knowledge
>>>> of
>>>>> VBA programming constructs make tags unnecessary (and bad practice)
>>>>> FOR
>>>> ME.
>>>>> Of course if tags are the right tool for you, then you absolutely
>>>>> should
>>>> use
>>>>> them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will not be responding to this thread any more, and sorry for the
>> rant.
>>>>> --
>>>>> John W. Colby
>>>>> www.ColbyConsulting.com <http://www.colbyconsulting.com/>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AccessD mailing list
>>>>> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>>>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>>>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AccessD mailing list
>>>> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>>>
>> --
>> AccessD mailing list
>> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>
>> -- 
>> AccessD mailing list
>> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>
> 



More information about the AccessD mailing list