[AccessD] Worth Upgrading for?

Max Wanadoo max.wanadoo at gmail.com
Fri Jul 24 12:05:57 CDT 2009


I wouldn't wait for the second coming of anything - I have Access 2003 which
for the last few years has done pretty much everything I have needed.  And
what is more, I understand it and it now understands me!  I even dream of it
and who knows, maybe it dreams of me.....

Can't be beaten.

Max



-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Charlotte Foust
Sent: 24 July 2009 16:45
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Worth Upgrading for?

But you can already do that with classes that inherit .Net
TypedDatasets.  Why wait for the second coming of Access?

Charlotte Foust 

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart
McLachlan
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 5:14 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: [AccessD] Worth Upgrading for?

http://blogs.msdn.com/access/archive/2009/07/22/access-2010-the-10-000-f
t-view.aspx

Centralize business logic. Data macros allow you to write logic behind
tables similar to SQL triggers. This makes it easier to maintain
applications because you can centralize business
logic:

--
Stuart
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com

-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com




More information about the AccessD mailing list