[AccessD] Access 2007 Again

Yes, that SharePoint stuff ties in with what Jim is doing.

Max



-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Mike Mattys
Sent: 10 March 2009 17:30
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2007 Again

Max,

I think there's a bunch of Interop stuff you can do with .Net that Access 
2007 handles 'better.'
Not sure 'cause I haven't tried - nor have I used SharePoint for which I see

a DoCmd.RunCommands ...

-
Michael R Mattys
MapPoint and Database Dev
www.mattysconsulting.com
-
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Max Wanadoo" <max.wanadoo at gmail.com>
To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" 
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2007 Again


> Thanks Rocky.
>
> Anybody got any other thoughts please?
>
> Max
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Rocky Smolin at
> Beach Access Software
> Sent: 10 March 2009 16:33
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access 2007 Again
>
> I don't think you'll find any 2007 fans on this list.  I still develop in
> 2003 for the same reason.  Can't figure out how 2007 works - don't have a
> compelling reason to use it. I have 2007 loaded on another machine just 
> for
> testing.  But all the 03 stuff works on 07 just dandy.
>
>
> Rocky Smolin
> Beach Access Software
> 858-259-4334
> www.e-z-mrp.com
> www.bchacc.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Max Wanadoo
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:27 AM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: [AccessD] Access 2007 Again
>
> Hi List,
> I am about to throw in the towel with Access 2007. I find it so incredibly
> hard to work with - as I have often mentioned before.
> Before I actually do that, can I ask this questions...
>
> Is there anything that is a real improvement over 2003?  Either that I can
> bring to the development for the end-user that I cannot do in 2003 or that
> makes the development easier than 2003 (I think I know the answer to that
> one!).
>
> I don't want to shoot myself in the foot here.  If, beneath the skin, the
> development side is not basically the same (not talking about cosmetic
> stuff, but has real substantially improved dev stuff) then I will need to
> take that on board.
>
> I am not looking for a List of differences - just your gut reactions 
> please.
>
> Thank you
>
> Max
>
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com 

-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com