[AccessD] Access/SQL

William Hindman wdhindman at dejpolsystems.com
Sat Nov 14 21:21:37 CST 2009


...its not a matter of "better" ...it's a matter of resources ...when I 
started with dot net my natural path was to learn vb.net ...but what I found 
is that there are far more examples written in c# available on the net than 
vb.net ...and once I started looking at those examples, including 
translations done by the web based code converters, it turned out that the 
syntax wasn't all that different ...so I started playing with c# and its now 
my language of choice but by no means expertise.

...there is no natural upgrade path from a vb app to a vb.net app, it's a 
whole new paradigm, vb in name only ...thus a lot of vb programmers and apps 
never made the transition ...otoh, C# has a lot in common with past C and 
Java languages and a lot of them did make the transition to C# and dot net 
...and they brought their tools and samples along.

William

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Mark Simms" <marksimms at verizon.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 9:53 PM
To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" 
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access/SQL

>>
>> I know I'm picking on you, but I get quickly frustrated with
>> arguments over which choice to make when the selection
>> criteria are not based on something concrete.
>>
>> Dan
>>
> The DICE stats ARE CONCRETE. If VB.NET were better, I think the ratio 
> would
> be reversed.
>
>
>
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 




More information about the AccessD mailing list