jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Fri Apr 15 18:29:50 CDT 2011
Personally, I think this would be a good thing. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com On 4/15/2011 6:48 PM, Stuart McLachlan wrote: > The problem as I see it is that "Public fields" are an abomination. > > Because Java has then, .Net has to as well :-( > > You should not be able to accept any "properties" of an object other than through GET/SET > processes. > >