[AccessD] Requirements (was: I should be able to do this -resolved)

Brad Marks BradM at blackforestltd.com
Thu Dec 8 13:29:15 CST 2011


"Weeks of Computer Programming Can Save You Hours of Planning"  

:-)







-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Dan Waters
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 7:47 AM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Requirements (was: I should be able to do this
-resolved)

Requirements are more important.  You can't build a good house with bad
plans - no matter how good the builders are!

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Mark Simms
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 7:38 AM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: Re: [AccessD] I should be able to do this - resolved

Re: "......someone mentioned that the company uses 360-day years"

Oh boy, here we go with a fundamental issue that should have come out
way
back in the requirements definition.
The best programmers in the world cannot overcome something like this.
On the other hand, the best analysts cannot overcome bugs caused by
crappy
coding.

So what's more important: the analysis or the coding ?



--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com

-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.





More information about the AccessD mailing list