Stuart McLachlan
stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
Fri Jan 20 15:50:39 CST 2012
So do I. I still do most of my development in 2003, even for clients on 2007/2010. -- Stuart On 20 Jan 2012 at 13:41, David McAfee wrote: > Actually, I prefer A97 & A2K over A2007 too :) > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Stuart McLachlan <stuart at lexacorp.com.pg>wrote: > > > > > > > On 20 Jan 2012 at 12:48, jwcolby wrote: > > > > > The problem is that they remain firmly mired in Access 2000. Yep. Sigh. > > > > > > > I've got one client in the same situation, but mired in A97 :( > > > > > The biggest issue with Access 2K from the perspective of SQL Server is > > that forms cannot be bound to > > > recordsets and still be editable. > > > > > > > They can if you use ODBC linking to the SQL Server tables and bind the > > form the tables of > > Access queries based on them > > > > -- > > Stuart McLachlan > > > > Ph: +675 340 4392 > > Mob: +675 7100 2028 > > Web: http://www.lexacorp.com.pg > > > > -- > > AccessD mailing list > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- Stuart McLachlan Ph: +675 340 4392 Mob: +675 7100 2028 Web: http://www.lexacorp.com.pg