[AccessD] Back to 8

I suspect you're right, Gustav.  But I'm not a network guy so it's hard for
me even to know what questions to ask.  Anyway - that's his story and he's
sticking to it.

I'm off to Monrovia today to the regional robotics competition (my kid - not
me) and one of the parents is a network DBA guy.  I'll have a gabble with
him - we'll have all day up there. Let you know what I find out.

R

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 4:35 AM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Back to 8

Hi Rocky

No that doesn't sound right. I've never heard of this and cannot Google a
single hit mentioning such "incompatibility". Could you get a reference from
him?

There may, of course, be other reason for an upgrade but this seems faint.

/gustav

>>> rockysmolin at bchacc.com 02-03-13 0:00 >>>
OK - notwork guy says they're using small business server 2003. Making it
compatible with IE10 would take 4-10 hours. The upgrade to Server 2011,
which would work with IE10 would cost $3300 plus his time.

Sound right?

R

--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com