[AccessD] Backend database corruption

Jim Lawrence accessd at shaw.ca
Sun Feb 22 17:41:33 CST 2015


Hi Janet:

I am not ignoring you, it is that I will have to dig up some samples to show you that may be helpful.

Jim 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Janet Erbach" <jerbach.db at gmail.com>
To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 2:22:46 PM
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Backend database corruption

Jim -

I would, indeed like to learn more.  All of my connections are DAO...

Thank you!

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Jim Lawrence <accessd at shaw.ca> wrote:

> Hi Janet:
>
> Nice to hear from you...is this too late for comment? Assuming no, let me
> add to the discussion.
>
> Most people on this list have heard me preach on the topic more often that
> not. To start with, on any major applications, developed in Access, I for
> one, would and never used DAO data connection. As all of you pointed out it
> is just too unstable, especially in a heavy work environment.
>
> You can use ADO. The protocol is on all Windows from Win95 to Win8.x and I
> believe on Win10, but I haven't checked yet. It is rugged, fast and
> completely recoverable from. It matters not how large, distributed or
> complex the application is.
>
> If you want to learn more or want help just ask.
>
> Jim
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Janet Erbach" <jerbach.db at gmail.com>
> To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <
> accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 11:01:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Backend database corruption
>
> THANK YOU ALL for your responses - this is all very helpful.  I'm going to
> push for hard wiring all of the connections as soon as possible;  I also
> like the idea of logging when the write operations are happening to see how
> much overlapping traffic there is.
>
> I think the CSV approach is very interesting too, and will bring that up in
> a meeting next week along with presenting the SQL backend option.  I think
> we would try the CSV approach first. It would be difficult to convert to a
> SQL backend, I think, on the 20 hours a week that they've alotted
> me...especially since more than half of that time is via remote connection.
>
> Again - thank you all.  I am much relieved to have a few options to pursue!
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Darryl Collins <
> darryl at whittleconsulting.com.au> wrote:
>
> > Yes.  John is spot on.  These would be my primary solutions to this issue
> > as well.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Darryl.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:
> > accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John W. Colby
> > Sent: Friday, 20 February 2015 8:06 AM
> > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Backend database corruption
> >
> > Loss of connection while writing to an Access DB is a known issue, never
> > fixed, and probably unfixable.
> >
> > Don't use Wifi / WAN with an Access BE.
> >
> > The best option is to move the BE to a SQL Server BE.  That will
> > absolutely solve this issue.  If you must continue to use Access as the
> BE,
> > then write CSVs to a directory on the server and have an Access app
> RUNNING
> > ON THE SERVER watch for these CSVs and import them into the table.  At
> > least if the write to the CSV file is interrupted, it does not corrupt
> the
> > BE.
> >
> > John W. Colby
> >
> > On 2/19/2015 3:01 PM, Janet Erbach wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > It's been years since I've addressed this group, so please be patient
> > > with me while I get back into the swing of this.
> > >
> > > I've been an Access developer for the last 15 years or so.  Until
> > > recently I created straightforward apps used on a small group of
> > > hardwired networked computers that had 5 or 6 users in the app at the
> > same time.
> > >
> > > Last year I took a job with a large manufacturing plant, and just
> > > deployed a very complex app that I co-wrote with one of the
> > > access-fluent production supervisors.  It is supposed to run non-stop
> > > on 20+ machines, all with WIFI connections.  It writes machine
> > > production data to a set of front-end tables;  every 15 minutes the
> > > app checks to see if there is network connectivity - if there is, the
> > > front-end table data is posted to the back-end tables on the network,
> > > the front-end tables are emptied, and the loop begins again.
> > >
> > > The app worked pretty well when it was running on one or two machines.
> > > Now that it's up on 20 machines, the back end is corrupting multiple
> > > times during the day - which, of course, brings the whole show to a
> > > halt.  The error log seems to indicate that loss of a network
> > > connection during the back-end write operation proceeds the corruption.
> > >
> > > I have two questions.  Will hard wiring the network connection to
> > > these machines go a long way towards stopping the corruption?  Is
> > > there anything else that could be contributing to this that I need to
> be
> > aware of?
> > >
> > > Thank you for your help.
> > >
> > > Janet Erbach
> >
> > --
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> >
> > --
> > AccessD mailing list
> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> >
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com


More information about the AccessD mailing list