<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
You will have problems with Ole Automation and references to Excel Word
Outlook if they are used, but by sacrificing a bit of speed you can use late
binding to default to to the installed version of Word etc rather than using
Word 9 or Word 10 libraries.<br>
Also make sure your clients are all using the same version of Jet, I
believe A2K came with Jet SP3. You can get Jet SP6 from here which may
ameliorate your odd crashes. get the correct version for the OS. Before you
install SP6 on a computer that is running Windows 95, Windows 98, or Windows
NT 4.0, you must already have Jet 4.0 Service Pack 3 (SP3) or later installed.
You have at least Jet 4.0 (SP3) if the file msjet40.dll is version 4.00.2927.4
or later<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q282010">http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q282010</a><br>
<br>
Mark Whittinghill wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid006a01c314cf$7b0b4db0$0400000a@PASCAL">
<pre wrap="">That was my plan, to set default to A2K. I didn't know that about the
decompiling. If I build an app in AXP/A2K default then distribute it to A2K
users, will there be any troubles with references or anything?
Mark Whittinghill
Symphony Information Services
612-333-1311
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mwhittinghill@symphonyinfo.com">mwhittinghill@symphonyinfo.com</a>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Waters" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dwaters@usinternet.com"><dwaters@usinternet.com></a>
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:accessd@databaseadvisors.com"><accessd@databaseadvisors.com></a>
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 11:29 AM
Subject: RE: [AccessD] Upgrading to Access 2002 from A2K
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Mark,
There is a recognized bug in AXP that prevents decompiling an mdb.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->However,
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">if you set the mdb format to A2K when you develop in AXP, you will still
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->be
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">able to decompile. You can choose A2K to be the Default File Format in
Tools | Options - Advanced before creating a new database.
Other than that, I am pretty satisfied with AXP. I've had an occasional
crash, but nothing I would consider a problem. I am, however, an avid
control-s guy!
Dan Waters
Quality Process Solutions
-----Original Message-----
From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:accessd-bounces@databaseadvisors.com">accessd-bounces@databaseadvisors.com</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:accessd-bounces@databaseadvisors.com">mailto:accessd-bounces@databaseadvisors.com</a>] On Behalf Of Mark
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->Whittinghill
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 11:51 AM
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:accessd@databaseadvisors.com">accessd@databaseadvisors.com</a>
Subject: [AccessD] Upgrading to Access 2002 from A2K
Hi all,
Recently my computer died due to power source failure, though I was able
to recover files later. I was due to upgrade my computer here anyway, so
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->I
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">now have a new computer with Windows XP, the old one was Windows 2000. We
have yet to do any work in Access 2002. Some of our clients use that, but
we just send Access 2000 versions.
I never used to have problems with Access 2000, though I have read many
posts from people who had. Now that I have Windows XP, I am having
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->crashes
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">all the time, with the "Send Error Report" dialog box. Twice in the last
couple weeks I have had things get corrupted so bad that I just had to
restore my file from an earlier version and flush my work for the day down
the toilet. Based on what I am hearing of Access 2002, I am thinking that
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->I
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">should just upgrade to that, even though I work in 2000 file format. Are
there any downsides to doing that? Thanks for any advice.
Mark Whittinghill
Symphony Information Services
612-333-1311
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mwhittinghill@symphonyinfo.com">mwhittinghill@symphonyinfo.com</a>
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:AccessD@databaseadvisors.com">AccessD@databaseadvisors.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd">http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd</a>
Website: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.databaseadvisors.com">http://www.databaseadvisors.com</a>
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:AccessD@databaseadvisors.com">AccessD@databaseadvisors.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd">http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd</a>
Website: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.databaseadvisors.com">http://www.databaseadvisors.com</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
_______________________________________________
AccessD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:AccessD@databaseadvisors.com">AccessD@databaseadvisors.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd">http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd</a>
Website: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.databaseadvisors.com">http://www.databaseadvisors.com</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>