[dba-SQLServer] Arthur's article

That's why I was confused, see that paragraph the way it opens?, and as 
a personal preference, I do all my view/sproc/function creation and 
edits over in QA instead of my ADP (access 2000). It's all a mater of 
preference tho.

Steven W. Erbach wrote:

>Francisco,
>
>  
>
>>>Are you kidding me?  Access 2003 is sans ADP's!!!! :O. <<
>>>      
>>>
>
>OK, let me in on the joke. How else am I supposed to interpret this article by Arthur? (from builder.com newsletter, 9-Mar-2004):
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Enhance Enterprise Manager with Access 
>  
>
<SNIP>

>The real question is: Why did Microsoft kill ADP files in Access 2003? Possibly because they were so good that they made Enterprise Manager look foolish by comparison; or perhaps because Yukon is such a radical change that it would demand a complete rewrite of the relevant code. Your guess is as good as mine. 
>  
>
<snip>

-- 
-Francisco