Bryan Carbonnell
carbonnb at gmail.com
Wed May 16 13:06:28 CDT 2007
On 5/16/07, Steve Erbach <erbachs at gmail.com> wrote: > Of course, if the server goes down then everybody goes down. But the > positives, I think, would be ease of upgrading, keeping everybody at > the same revision level simultaneously, and low cost. > > Do you see any flies in the ointment here? I think it's very feasible, > but I'd welcome any cautioning voices. Does everyone automatically get updates or do they have to pay for them? What if someone doesn't want to or just doesn't pay for an upgrade? What if they don't want the data to travel on the 'net, but what it installed on their Intranet? Those 2 spring to mind quickly. -- Bryan Carbonnell - carbonnb at gmail.com Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "What a great ride!"