From fuller.artful at gmail.com Fri Jan 25 07:30:13 2019 From: fuller.artful at gmail.com (Arthur Fuller) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 08:30:13 -0500 Subject: [dba-SQLServer] The Future will be Documented Message-ID: So sayeth the president and CEO of MongoDB, who is not exactly a disinterested person. But at the same time, that is not to say that his opinion is wrong. You can read a short piece about what's wrong with tables here . -- Arthur From stuart at lexacorp.com.pg Fri Jan 25 15:47:00 2019 From: stuart at lexacorp.com.pg (Stuart McLachlan) Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 07:47:00 +1000 Subject: [dba-SQLServer] The Future will be Documented In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5C4B83D4.26698.12DC09B3@stuart.lexacorp.com.pg> Seems to be more a hit piece on Amzon's DocumentDB which is direct competor to MongoDB than anything about "what's wrong with tables" It just starts out by saying the document model is the "best way to deal with data" and dismissed relational databases without any supporting reasons. I'm not buying it. On 25 Jan 2019 at 8:30, Arthur Fuller wrote: > So sayeth the president and CEO of MongoDB, who is not exactly a > disinterested person. But at the same time, that is not to say that > his opinion is wrong. You can read a short piece about what's wrong > with tables here > . > > -- > Arthur > _______________________________________________ > dba-SQLServer mailing list > dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver > http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > From accessd at shaw.ca Sun Jan 27 23:02:30 2019 From: accessd at shaw.ca (Jim Lawrence) Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 22:02:30 -0700 (MST) Subject: [dba-SQLServer] The Future will be Documented In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1048161666.116689336.1548651750865.JavaMail.zimbra@shaw.ca> I understand there is some big changes with MongoDB: https://stratechery.com/2019/aws-mongodb-and-the-economic-realities-of-open-source/ Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arthur Fuller" To: "Discussion concerning MS SQL Server" Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 5:30:13 AM Subject: [dba-SQLServer] The Future will be Documented So sayeth the president and CEO of MongoDB, who is not exactly a disinterested person. But at the same time, that is not to say that his opinion is wrong. You can read a short piece about what's wrong with tables here . -- Arthur _______________________________________________ dba-SQLServer mailing list dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver http://www.databaseadvisors.com From accessd at shaw.ca Sun Jan 27 23:26:38 2019 From: accessd at shaw.ca (Jim Lawrence) Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 22:26:38 -0700 (MST) Subject: [dba-SQLServer] The Future will be Documented In-Reply-To: <5C4B83D4.26698.12DC09B3@stuart.lexacorp.com.pg> References: <5C4B83D4.26698.12DC09B3@stuart.lexacorp.com.pg> Message-ID: <2095529917.116807712.1548653198515.JavaMail.zimbra@shaw.ca> As the source codes to both MongoDB and DocumentDB are basically identical and MongoDB was created first... Of course any GPL licensed applications can be forked, used, modified and adapted. The products can not be sold but the related management services can be sold. Amazon, is using a fork and it is selling their expertise on AWS, as no one can say that their infrastructure is not ultimately scalable and infinitely more stable. MongoDB on its own can not compete with Amazon. Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "stuart" To: "Discussion concerning MS SQL Server" Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 1:47:00 PM Subject: Re: [dba-SQLServer] The Future will be Documented Seems to be more a hit piece on Amzon's DocumentDB which is direct competor to MongoDB than anything about "what's wrong with tables" It just starts out by saying the document model is the "best way to deal with data" and dismissed relational databases without any supporting reasons. I'm not buying it. On 25 Jan 2019 at 8:30, Arthur Fuller wrote: > So sayeth the president and CEO of MongoDB, who is not exactly a > disinterested person. But at the same time, that is not to say that > his opinion is wrong. You can read a short piece about what's wrong > with tables here > . > > -- > Arthur > _______________________________________________ > dba-SQLServer mailing list > dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver > http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > _______________________________________________ dba-SQLServer mailing list dba-SQLServer at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/dba-sqlserver http://www.databaseadvisors.com