Shamil Salakhetdinov
shamil at users.mns.ru
Fri Aug 5 16:12:33 CDT 2005
Hi All, Do you agree with this article/statement? "... So, why isn't there room in the software industry for a low cost provider, someone who uses the cheapest programmers available? (Remind me to ask Quark how that whole fire-everybody-and-hire-low-cost-replacements plan is working.) Here's why: duplication of software is free. That means that the cost of programmers is spread out over all the copies of the software you sell. With software, you can improve quality without adding to the incremental cost of each unit sold. Essentially, design adds value faster than it adds cost...." http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/HighNotes.html (I'm curios how you feel about that living there in rather well paid for programmers' work countries as far as I have heard and seen because I'm a kind of (alone) indirectly fighting with low cost programmers army here in my country when I'm trying to get work here at rates, which allow to keep my big family well and I'm also trying to stay straight against "dirt cheap" programmers from India, East Europe (yes, Russia too of course), China, Latin America etc competing for the projects on Internet sites like RentACoder. Not easy excersize I must say. Unfortunately I don't have enough real samples of the code of my competitors to say that cheap programmers can't be good by definition. With some rare exceptions, which only prove this rule. Am I wrong that cheap programmers can't be good? - if I'm wrong and if Joel is wrong then for me this means that programming profession will soon die even there in your countries under the pressure of "dirt cheap" Eastern and Latin America programmers' dumping rates forcing most of software programming to go off-shore...) This another article from Joel is also interesting I think: "Rub a dub dub" http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000348.html Shamil