Gustav Brock
gustav at cactus.dk
Thu Apr 3 07:54:01 CST 2003
Hi Susan Oops, read another post about Access 11 running on Win2000+ only ... So you don't mean Win 3.1 but Win9x, right? /gustav > As far as I know, Access 1.x and 2.0 are the only versions that run on > Windows 3.1x. So that shock - moving from Win 3.1x to a Win32 platform > - will only happen for those moving now from Access 2.0 and lower > (running on Win 3.1x!) to Access 95 or higher. > How many could that be?? > Is any member of this list running Access 2.0/Win 3.1x exclusively? > Please step forward. > /gustav >> Well, a shock for anyone still using Win 3.1 -- can't. You have to upgrade >> Windows to use Access 11. >> Susan H. >>> Are you sure about Access 11? >>> >>> Quoting Mike Gunderloy, >>> Developer Central #24: Office 2003 First Impressions and more! >>> >>> "Access has no significant changes from Access 2002. It's not an exciting >>> time to be an Access developer. I'm revising one Access book for the new >>> version, but don't expect to do much other work with it." >>> >>> /gustav >>> >>> >>> > And what if it is? Think about it guys -- although some conversions are >>> > more work than others, and certainly Access 11 is going to be a shock >>> > (and Access 12 even more so) for a few still running older >>> > versions on W 3.1, has >>> > MS ever really just left you hanging? Well, maybe it has <g>, I probably >>> > shouldn't ask when I don't really know the answer.