Drew Wutka
DWUTKA at marlow.com
Fri Apr 25 01:31:36 CDT 2003
I don't want to cause trouble here, but I would like to point out that this is a CIVIL Access discussion. I can't count the threads that I have found boring, but I would never say ANYTHING to anyone about stopping them, ever. I never know when I might find something useful.....and even if I never find something useful out of it, someone else did. That is the ONLY thing that counts on this List. Just my two cents. Drew -----Original Message----- From: Wortz, Charles [mailto:CWortz at tea.state.tx.us] Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 10:49 AM To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: RE: Hair-Splitting definitions of Macros - was RE: [AccessD] VBAquestion Susan, I did not say you should kill it. If you and Drew think you still have something to say on the subject, why not take it to either the OT list or discuss it privately? But Seth and I, and maybe others, think you two have gone beyond the point where others are getting any useful information out of your discussion. Charles Wortz Software Development Division Texas Education Agency 1701 N. Congress Ave Austin, TX 78701-1494 512-463-9493 CWortz at tea.state.tx.us -----Original Message----- From: Susan Harkins [mailto:harkins at iglou.com] Sent: Thursday 2003 Apr 24 10:42 To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: Re: Hair-Splitting definitions of Macros - was RE: [AccessD] VBAquestion Fine -- kill it -- that's just great -- because it doesn't mean anything to you two, I'm just told to shut up -- that's crap! Susan H. > Susan and Drew, > > I have to agree with Seth, you two are not coming to some agreement > about what is a macro, you two are into splitting-hairs on semantics. > In other words, your discussion has ceased to be productive. > > Charles Wortz _______________________________________________ AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com