William Hindman
wdhindman at bellsouth.net
Wed Apr 30 16:23:09 CDT 2003
Lembit ...been working out of town the past week so I missed this topic when it first presented itself. ...though Arthur and I fervently disagree on other matters, on AccessD and a second OT list we are of one accord ...it was frequently discussed within dba in the past, as the dba-OT list moved further and further away from its AccessD parentage, but never achieved the critical mass necessary to get it from discussion to reality ...thus the problem remains, no one wanting only an OT technical answer would want to traipse through the hundreds of dba-OT daily messages on every other topic imaginable just to filter out those he's interested in ...its intimidating and I'm sure its stopped many an AccessD user from posting an OT tech question there ...not that we don't see them occasionally but only from existing dba-OT list members ...thus implementing Arthur's suggestion would, imnsho, be of immediate and substantial value to all AccessD list members ...the sooner the better. :)) William Hindman "I am extraordinarily patient, provided I get my own way in the end." Margaret Thatcher ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lembit Soobik" <Lembit.Soobik at t-online.de> To: <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 1:39 PM Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Request for new OT list > Arthur, > we are considering this, but at the moment I cannot give you a schedule. > Lembit > > Lembit Soobik > > > > > I propose that dba sets up a new list which is for questions, called OTSH > > (software and hardware). On this list we could ask questions about the Word > > object model, the LinkSys router, MapPoint and Share-Point Portal Server, to > > cite just a few possible subjects (that are currently on my mind). > > > > I don't like to clutter this list with OT messages about such stuff, and I > > get into too many political arguments on the OT list so I unsubbed. > > > > On OTSH, if certain threads become popular they could eventually assume the > > status of the access, sql, visio, vb &c. lists. Meanwhile they could share > > one space and we could subscribe or not, knowing vaguely the content. > > > > Arthur > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > AccessD mailing list > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >