[AccessD] Subdatasheet vs. Relationships?

Wortz, Charles CWortz at tea.state.tx.us
Fri Aug 22 07:19:46 CDT 2003


Christopher,

What gives is that you inherited a db from someone that knew nothing
about db design.  My condolences to you.  It may be easier to throw it
away and start from scratch.

Charles Wortz
Software Development Division
Texas Education Agency
1701 N. Congress Ave
Austin, TX 78701-1494
512-463-9493
CWortz at tea.state.tx.us



-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Hawkins [mailto:clh at christopherhawkins.com] 
Sent: Thursday 2003 Aug 21 16:01
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: [AccessD] Subdatasheet vs. Relationships?

I have inherited an A2K database that has numerous tables related to one
another via the SubDatasheet property. Make no mistake, I hate this
feature with a passion because it slows databases down. 
However, if there is a legitimate reason to use it I'll buy in.

The db has no relationships defined in relationships view. In the mdb is
a main form based on a single table (no JOINS in the RecordSource), with
several subforms on tabs. Each subform is getting data from a single,
distinct tables (that is, no two subforms use the same table for data.
All subforms are linked to the main form by BlahID.

Now, for the life of me, I can't figure out what using the SubDataSheet
property of the tables does to help this application. 
What gives?

-Christopher- 


More information about the AccessD mailing list