Gustav Brock
gustav at cactus.dk
Tue Dec 9 13:11:00 CST 2003
Hi Paul > But do they guarantee completely consistent backups? Anyone can backup files > in a running mdb -- but how can you be sure there are no update/delete > locks, or pending/reversing transactions in place? > Microsoft emphatically states that you can't rely on the internal > consistency of the data when you do a live backup of an mdb file - > regardless of whether you backup whole files, or tables individually. > Honestly, I'd love to be able do live backups of Access data, but until I > see proof that they handle these data consistency issues properly, I'll hold > off. After all, a restore that scrambles the owner's data is of no use to > anyone. > I'll end by restating my current position: Access is not an enterprise data > server. If you need 24/7 access, high concurrency, failover/data recovery, > and live backups, move to SQL Server or the like. If you are not up to the cost and hardware requirements of SQL Server, the free Firebird/InterBase engine offers "Database Shadow" and "Online backup": http://www.ibphoenix.com/main.nfs?a=ibphoenix&page=ibp_60_factsheet Also, this engine has a low footprint and runs on many platforms - even MacOS X. /gustav